|
|
Poster
presentation at the 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting,
Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1, 2001
Paper Number 012298
Session 128
Poster #142
A
Low-Cost Digester to Control Odors at a 120,000 Head Hog Farm
Mark Moser
Resource Conservation Management, Inc.
PO Box 4715
Berkeley, CA 94704
Phone 510-658-4466
FAX 510-658 -2729
rcmdigesters@att.net
Poster presentation at the 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting,
Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1, 2001
ABSTRACT
A
single cell heated covered lagoon was designed to treat manure for odor
control from 120,000 pigs in South America.
The system cost $1,200,000.
The system started up readily and is producing an average of
530,000 ft3 of biogas/day. The
system benefits and methane reductions are described.
A summary table is presented to allow comparisons of costs.
Biogas recovery and use in boilers or engine-generators is discussed for
the farm. Start up and
operational lessons learned are presented.
Keywords:
Biogas, methane, odor, anaerobic digestion, digester, covered
lagoon, nutrient management, pathogens
Introduction
Anaerobic digestion is more
extensively used outside of the US where treatment of animal waste has
been a concern for a longer time. An
anaerobic digester is a vessel designed to retain decomposing manure for
sufficient time at the designed operating temperature to allow the
growth of methanogenic bacteria in a “steady-state”.
Electricity and heat production are direct benefits of anaerobic
digestion. The effluent of a digester has an earthy smell with some
ammonia present. The first dairy digester systems in the US were
installed principally to produce energy during the energy crisis.
The
first pig manure digester systems in the US were installed principally
to control manure odors. Today, farm motivation worldwide for building
and operating anaerobic digesters has expanded from direct energy
benefits to include key non-energy benefits such as: odor control,
improved manure handling, mineralization of organic nitrogen,
weed seed destruction, pathogen reduction, reduction of
greenhouse gas release, and byproduct production such as digested dairy
solids.
|
Poster
presentation at the 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting,
Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1, 2001
Complete Mix Digesters
Complete mix refers to a design approach toward a
goal rather than literal complete mixing.
Complete mix digesters are used to treat waste with 3 to 10%
total solids with adequate volatile solids to produce enough biogas (60%
methane, 40% carbon dioxide) to maintain digester temperature. These units are heated to maintain a high rate of
bacterial growth. Intermittent mixing or stirring with pumped gas or
water or mechanical means is used to improve the contact between
substrate and microorganisms thereby promoting decomposition of the
substrate.
A heated digester should represent a cost savings
over using an ambient temperature lagoon designed to Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) or American Society of Agricultural
Engineers (ASAE) standards to perform the same level of treatment for
odor control. Ambient
temperature lagoons would be 10-20 times larger than these digesters to
perform the same function. The
design and operation goal of the subject digester is consistent
biological stabilization of waste and odor control rather than
optimization of biogas production and use while stabilizing the waste.
Facilmente Engordas - 120,000 Head Pig Finishing Facility, South
America
Background
Engordas has 120,000 hog capacity in 120 buildings.
The site is operated as an all-in-all-out grow-finish facility.
Approximately 90 buildings were built with flushed manure systems
and 30 were constructed with pull plug manure collection.
All wastes were originally drained to a storage facility which
was the dammed upper portion of a small watershed drainage.
The storage facility has almost 88 acres of surface area but is
predominantly shallow, less than 10 feet average depth.
Quite a bit of shallow sloped land was included in the storage.
The facility was sized for about 6 months of volumetric storage.
Odor from the manure storage pond was not acceptable to the owners,
workers, neighbors, or government officials.
In addition, seasonal pumping of manure exposed large areas of
perimeter beaches that served as breeding grounds for copious quantities
of flies.
The owners committed to resolution of the problem,
conducting a world-wide solicitation for designers with demonstrated
cost effective technology. The farm owner chose Resource Conservation
Management, Inc. to design an innovative, low cost, heated, mixed
covered earthen lagoon digester based on similar success of the approach
that was demonstrated at Apex Pork in Rio, IL on an 8,900 head finisher
facility.
Manure Collection and Transfer
All
flush buildings are flushed daily with fresh water. The flush manure flows to collection tanks.
Collection tanks are pumped daily to the digester.
Pull plug buildings are pulled on a rotating schedule where 2 to
3 buildings are drained to a transfer tank on a daily
basis and then pumped to the digester. The daily flow to the digester
varies between 900 m3 and 1800 m3.
|
Poster
presentation at the 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting,
Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1, 2001
Digester
A bank-buried insulated floating cover is installed
on the 105 x 105 x 9 meter (346 x 346 x 29.7 ft) lagoon which can hold
roughly 20 days worth of manure (32,000 m3 approximately 8,000,000
gallons).
Digester Heating
The digester is operated at 35 degrees C and can
vary up to 4 degrees C. Digester
is heated with an external exchanger.
Digester Mixing
The digester is mechanically mixed.
Pump mixing is continuous.
Gas Production
The digester produces enough methane to fuel a
boiler to heat the digester and flares unused methane.
Gas production has varied between10,200 m3 to 15,500 m3 (360,000
to 550,000 ft3/d) since the digester startup.
After 2 hydraulic retention times with the farm fully populated,
the digester output averaged 530,000 ft3/d over a 2 month period.
Gas production fluctuations are expected due to fluctuations in
farm pig population.
Digester Effluent
Stabilized digester effluent flows to the storage
pond.
Digester Operations
The digester was started up over a 4 month period
in ending in November 2000. Flare operation began in late December with
flaring of 150,000 ft3 of biogas. By late January 2001 the system was
producing 5,600 m3 (200,000
ft3) of biogas per day. The unit was running well when the pig
population was brought up to farm capacity.
The digester maintained temperature during the
coldest times of the year. The digester has been through 3 grow-out
cycles without problems. The
system is simple to operate and a single operator is charged with
operating the system. The
main work is checking the system operations readings.
Construction Costs
The costs for construction are shown in the
appended table. Most
equipment was imported and these costs are included in the cost
estimate. In-country
construction costs are remarkably similar to US construction costs as
virtually all construction materials and equipment are imported, thereby
offsetting labor cost savings.
The capital cost is approximately
$10.06/pig of capacity. The
system life should be 15 years. Assuming no interest charges and 2.5
turns per year the cost per pig produced would be $0.27.
|
Poster
presentation at the 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting,
Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1, 2001
Operation Costs
Operations
are routine at this time. Approximately
1.5 men are working at the
digester, though their main work is pumping manure from buildings to the
digester and from the digester to storage.
Assuming this facility has 2.5 turns per year, the cost per pig
shipped is approximately $0.25.
Results
After 8 months of operation the digester is healthy
and operating well. It is
maintaining its heat level and the storage no longer emits malodorous
gases. The primary benefits to the owners are odor reduction of stored
and field applied manure. There have been no odor complaints since 4
months after the digester was started up. Compliance observations by
regulators continue, but the government participated in an open house 6
months after startup to demonstrate their support of the odor control
solution. The digester is able to accommodate the variation in manure
loading rate that results from all-in-all-out operation.
The attached figures present operational information including
influent flow, biogas flow and CO2 variations.
Lessons Learned
Several lessons of this project were: 1) Low cost,
in-ground, heated, mixed, floating cover digesters can meet farm
environmental needs; 2) Large single tank, anaerobic reactors are
possible on farms; 3) Finishing farms with flush manure collection have
the options of heated anaerobic digesters.
Future Options
The owner would like to generate electricity for
his operations. There is
the possibility to install about 1.5 megawatts of electric capacity. Equipment costs and benefits have been developed.
Equipment specifications have been developed.
Negotiations with the power company have begun.
The success of the project in meeting its
environmental goals led the owner to begin another project to retrofit
other farms with RCM design anaerobic digesters.
|
Poster
presentation at the 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting,
Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1, 2001

|
Poster
presentation at the 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting,
Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1, 2001
|
Poster
presentation at the 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting,
Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1, 2001
|
|